Comments Posted By D. Skinner
Displaying 1 To 1 Of 1 Comments
If the ravenous, imprudent blogging forced her to issue a statement making it clear that she was coerced, why is that a bad result? In other words, would she have *ever* given the real truth? Or would we have been left with her kind words for her kidnappers? Her first statements did a disservice to us in this war; however understandable they might have been psychologically, she is really only to be pitied if, in the end, she voluntarily clarified her statements. Which, indeed, she might have done, even absent the blogospheric pressure. Or would she have?
Comment Posted By D. Skinner On 2.04.2006 @ 15:12
